Sunday, February 7, 2010

Obama's NASA

President Obama has just unveiled a new plan for NASA that will, if implemented, vastly change the way that NASA functions. In addition to adding six billion dollars to NASA's budget over the next five years, this new approach would halt NASA's development of spacecrafts. Indeed, instead of creating their own space shuttles, NASA would fund private industries developing rockets and purchase tickets abord suck rockets. In addition to this, the plan calls for a much more multinational approach to space exploration, though the details of such ventures beyond Earth's orbit have not been revealed. While this plan could reinvigorate Space Exploration, it also could result in the death of it. By removing total government control from the development of space programs, Obama runs the risk of such programs failing and moving on. In other words, if the private sector is unable to deliver the tools NASA needs, NASA has no where to go. This plan, however, is clever in that it has fused government run and privately developed space technologies into a team working towards a better understanding of the cosmos. Still, I can't help but worry that by not allowing NASA to have complete control of their projects, space exploration might become less efficient. With the unbridled success of NASA's Mars explorer Spirit, it is obvious that NASA is still on the forefront of space travel and observation. As a result, I am left to wonder, "If it isn't broke, why is Obama trying to fix it?" I hope that this new strategy proves my concern invalid, and I must point out that, despite my uneasiness about the change, I am glad to see more money flowing to a section of our government that has consistently delivered.

Chang, Kenneth. "Billions for NASA, With a Push to Find New Ways Into Space.(National Desk)(NEWS ANALYSIS)(National Aeronautics and Space Administration)." The New York Times. (Feb 2, 2010): A16(L). Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Deerfield High School. 7 Feb. 2010 < http://find.galegroup.com >

No comments:

Post a Comment

Works Cited

"American Philosophical Society." World History: The Modern Era. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 31 Jan. 2010. ≤http://www.worldhistory.abc-clio.com≥.

Bonta, Steve. "Space Exploration Should Be Funded by the Private Sector." At Issue: Space Exploration. Ed. Daniel A. Leone. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 2005. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Deerfield High School. 7 Feb. 2010 ≤http://find.galegroup.com≥

Chang, Kenneth. "Billions for NASA, With a Push to Find New Ways Into Space.(National Desk)(NEWS ANALYSIS)(National Aeronautics and Space Administration)." The New York Times. (Feb 2, 2010): A16(L). Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Deerfield High School. 7 Feb. 2010 ≤http://find.galegroup.com≥

Eric Foner and John A. Garraty. "Manhattan Project." The Reader's Companion to American History Dec. 1 1991: n.p. SIRS Researcher. Web. 31 January 2010. ≤http://sks.sirs.com≥.

Heinlein, Robert. Short Science Fiction Tales. Ed. Isaac Asimov. New York: Collier Books, 1963. Print.

"Human Genome Project." American History. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 31 Jan. 2010. ≤http://www.americanhistory.abc-clio.com≥.

“John F. Kennedy.” Wikipedia. Wikipedia, 1 Feb 2010. Web. 1 Feb 2010. ≤http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy≥.

"Manhattan Project." World History: The Modern Era. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 31 Jan. 2010. ≤http://www.worldhistory.abc-clio.com ≥.

National Aeronautics and Space Administration. "Space Exploration Will Play an Important Role in America's Future." Opposing Viewpoints: America in the Twenty-First Century. Ed. Andrea C. Nakaya. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2006. Opposing Viewpoints Resource Center. Gale. Deerfield High School. 7 Feb. 2010 ≤http://find.galegroup.com≥

"Science in America." American History. ABC-CLIO, 2010. Web. 28 Jan. 2010. ≤http://www.americanhistory.abc-clio.com≥.